Power Management

Documentation of solar collection, storage, and power consumption for self-sustaining traverse. The system operates without external energy input beyond available solar radiation. Power collection, capacity management, and consumption budgeting determine operational continuity across extended routes. This note consolidates measured solar output, battery characteristics, system load profiles, and operational procedures for power-constrained traverse.

Solar panel output varies by panel orientation, sun angle, seasonal position, and atmospheric conditions. Measured values represent direct measurement under specified conditions.

Solar panel output by orientation and latitude corridor (watts per square meter)
Panel Orientation Northern Corridor Central Corridor Southern Corridor
South-facing horizontal mount 620 680 700
South-facing 30° tilt 750 780 760
South-facing 45° tilt 770 800 770
South-facing 60° tilt 720 750 700
Single-axis tracking 820 880 900
Dual-axis tracking 880 920 940

Optimal tilt angle by corridor: Northern corridor platforms achieve maximum collection at 45–50° tilt angle during mid-season traverse, with seasonal adjustment of ±15° providing 5–8% efficiency gain in spring and fall months. Central corridor operations use 30–35° baseline tilt year-round, with minimal seasonal adjustment required. Southern corridor platforms maintain 25–30° tilt for maximum collection across all seasons. Single-axis tracking (automated adjustment along primary axis) increases collection by 15–25% relative to fixed-angle mounting; dual-axis tracking increases collection by 25–40% but requires mechanical power input and increases system complexity.

Collection efficiency under non-ideal conditions: Overcast sky conditions reduce measured output to 40–60% of rated clear-sky output, depending on cloud density and distribution. Dust accumulation on panel surfaces reduces output by approximately 2–5% per day without cleaning, scaling with local atmospheric dust concentration and particle size. Fine dust (1–10 micron) accumulates more rapidly and reduces efficiency more severely than coarse dust. Canopy cover (forest, dense brush) reduces output by 10–30% depending on canopy density, leaf area, and sun angle relative to canopy gaps. Partial canopy cover (40–60% of panel area shaded by foliage) typically reduces output to 50–70% of open-sky rating. Dense canopy (80%+ shaded area) reduces output to 10–30% of rated output.

Panel area versus daily energy collection (clear conditions, fixed 35° tilt, central corridor)
Panel Area (m²) Spring/Fall (Wh/day) Summer Peak (Wh/day) Winter Minimum (Wh/day)
1.0 4,800 6,200 2,400
2.0 9,600 12,400 4,800
3.0 14,400 18,600 7,200
4.0 19,200 24,800 9,600
5.0 24,000 31,000 12,000
Solar collection values measured at seasonal intervals under clear-sky conditions on documented routes. Output measurements taken at solar noon ±3 hours when sun angle is maximum. Efficiency percentages under degraded conditions derived from multiple daily measurements across different atmospheric and canopy cover scenarios. Panel orientation optimization assumes stationary measurement points; moving platforms can optimize tilt angle continuously during stationary periods only.

Battery storage capacity is measured in watt-hours (Wh), representing total electrical energy stored. Discharge characteristics depend on load level, temperature, and cycle count.

Battery discharge curve by load level (nominal capacity: 20,000 Wh)
Load Level Discharge Rate (Wh/hr) Time to 50% (hours) Time to 20% (hours) Effective Capacity (%)
Low (200 W continuous) 200 50 80 98%
Moderate (400 W continuous) 400 25 40 96%
Standard (600 W continuous) 600 16.7 26.7 93%
High (1,000 W continuous) 1,000 10 16 88%
Peak (1,500 W burst) 1,500 6.7 10.7 75%

Temperature effects on capacity: Battery performance degrades predictably with temperature reduction. Each degree Celsius below 0°C reduces effective discharge capacity by 1–2% depending on battery chemistry. At −10°C, effective capacity is reduced to 80–90% of nominal. At −20°C, effective capacity is reduced to 60–75% of nominal. These capacity reductions are temporary; capacity recovers as temperature returns to nominal range. Cold-weather operation requires reducing load levels proportionally or accepting shorter operational periods between charging cycles. Preheating battery systems to 15–20°C before high-load operation restores capacity within 1–2 hours.

Cycle count and degradation: Lithium-based batteries degrade approximately 0.1% per complete charge-discharge cycle (cycle counted as one full 0% to 100% charge event). After 1,000 cycles, nominal capacity is reduced to approximately 90% of original capacity. After 3,000 cycles, nominal capacity is reduced to approximately 70% of original capacity. Degradation rate increases nonlinearly after 3,000 cycles. Partial-cycle charging (charging from 20% to 80% rather than 0% to 100%) extends cycle life by approximately 50% by reducing stress on battery terminals and chemical layers.

Minimum operational reserve: Safe continuous operation requires maintaining minimum 20% battery charge. At 20% capacity (4,000 Wh on a 20,000 Wh battery), system power output is reduced to 50% of standard performance to maintain battery health and avoid deep-discharge damage. At 10% capacity, only critical systems (navigation, essential sensor input, communication beacon) operate. Below 10% capacity, the system enters survival mode with all non-critical systems powered down. Complete discharge (0% remaining charge) causes battery damage and may result in inability to recharge without external power source.

Discharge curves verified under controlled load conditions in laboratory environment at nominal temperature (20°C). Temperature compensation factors derived from field testing across seasonal conditions on documented routes. Cycle count and degradation rates represent lithium iron phosphate (LFP) chemistry; other battery types show different degradation profiles.

Power consumption varies by traverse speed, terrain class, and sensor configuration. Daily power budget must account for all concurrent loads and establish sustainable consumption within available collection capacity.

Power consumers and typical loads during traverse
System Typical Load Operating Mode Duty Cycle
Locomotion (electric drive) 500–2,000 W Continuous during motion 4–8 hours/day
LIDAR sensor 25 W Continuous 24 hours/day
Radar sensor 15 W Continuous 24 hours/day
Acoustic detection 10 W Continuous 24 hours/day
Navigation compute 30 W Continuous 24 hours/day
Communication subsystem 20 W Burst transmission 1–2 hours/day
Lighting/obstacle detection 50–150 W Conditional on light level 0–6 hours/day
System thermal management 40 W Continuous 24 hours/day
Daily power budget by traverse type and terrain (20,000 Wh battery, 3.0 m² solar panel)
Traverse Type Terrain Class Avg. Speed Daily Consumption (Wh) Daily Collection (Wh) Net Daily Balance
Flat grassland Low 6 km/h 8,200 14,400 +6,200
Rolling terrain Moderate 4 km/h 11,500 14,400 +2,900
Mixed forest Moderate 3 km/h 9,800 7,200 −2,600
Alpine scree High 2 km/h 15,200 14,400 −800
Canyon passage Extreme 1.5 km/h 18,600 2,400 −16,200

Flat grassland terrain (low-friction surfaces, minimal gradient, clear solar exposure) requires approximately 1,350 Wh per kilometer of travel at 6 km/h average speed, including continuous sensor operation and basic lighting when conditions warrant. Net power generation exceeds consumption by significant margin, allowing battery charging even during active traverse.

Rolling terrain (intermittent gradient, mixed surface conditions, variable canopy) requires approximately 2,875 Wh per kilometer of travel at 4 km/h average speed. Daily budget is marginal; battery charge remains stable with moderate solar input but requires stationary charging period to recover reserve capacity.

Mixed forest traverse (dense canopy, high-friction terrain, reduced solar exposure) requires approximately 3,267 Wh per kilometer of travel at 3 km/h average speed. Solar collection is severely reduced by canopy cover; battery discharge exceeds generation on traverse days. Extended stationary charging periods (2–3 days minimum) are required after each forest segment.

Alpine scree traverse (high-friction surfaces, steep gradient, variable solar exposure at high elevation, clear sky conditions) requires approximately 7,600 Wh per kilometer of travel at 2 km/h average speed. Power budget is critically constrained; daily consumption may marginally exceed solar generation even under clear conditions. Battery degradation occurs unless traverse is interrupted with stationary charging periods every 1–2 days.

Canyon passage (extreme-friction terrain, tight gradient, full canopy shade, low solar angles) requires approximately 12,400 Wh per kilometer of travel at 1.5 km/h average speed or slower. Solar collection is negligible; battery discharge is severe and unsustainable except for brief high-priority transit missions. Canyon segments must be planned as battery-depletion events; systems enter degraded operational mode immediately upon entry.

Daily power budgets calculated using representative load profiles across documented terrain types and seasonal solar conditions in central corridor. Consumption values include continuous sensor operation, thermal management, and estimated lighting loads. Speed and distance values represent typical traverse rates observed across routes; actual rates vary by platform configuration and specific surface conditions. Budget calculations assume nominal battery temperature (15–20°C); cold-weather operation requires 10–20% budget adjustment.

Recharging occurs only during stationary periods. Solar collection rate, panel area, battery state, and seasonal conditions determine charging time and route planning constraints.

Charging time from minimum reserve (20%) to full capacity
Panel Area Conditions Charge Rate (W) Time to Full (hours) Days Required*
2.0 m² Clear, optimal angle 1,200 13.3 0.8
3.0 m² Clear, optimal angle 1,800 8.9 0.5
4.0 m² Clear, optimal angle 2,400 6.7 0.4
3.0 m² Overcast (50% output) 900 17.8 1.1
3.0 m² Partial canopy (30% output) 540 29.6 1.9

*Calculated assuming 10-hour effective solar collection window at rated output; actual duration depends on seasonal variation of collection hours.

Solar collection window by season: Northern corridor experiences 7–8 hours of useful collection (sun angle above 30°) during winter months, increasing to 12–14 hours during summer peak. Central corridor maintains 10–12 hours year-round. Southern corridor achieves 11–13 hours minimum during winter, extending to 14–15 hours in summer. Collection window shifts earlier in summer (sunrise collection begins at 05:30–06:00) and later in winter (collection extends to 16:30–17:00).

Route planning implications: Segments with high canopy coverage (forest, dense brush areas) reduce solar generation below consumption rate and require pre-planning of stationary charging periods. A segment requiring 2 days of traverse through continuous forest must be preceded by a 2–3 day stationary charging period to build reserve capacity. Canyon passages with minimal solar exposure cannot be sustained continuously; a 1-day canyon passage requires 1 full day of stationary charging on either end. Route sequencing should alternate high-consumption (low-solar) terrain with open terrain that permits simultaneous charging and traverse.

Charging optimization: Battery charging rate is maximum during low battery state (0–50% capacity) and decreases as battery approaches full capacity to prevent overstress. Charging at the minimum reserve threshold (20%) to 80% capacity requires 60–70% of the time necessary to charge fully from reserve to 100%, with reduced stress on battery chemistry and extended cycle life. Route planning that targets 80% capacity as a practical "full" state and 20% as the operational minimum extends total battery cycle life by 30–40% compared to 0–100% cycling.

Charging times measured under laboratory conditions with optimal panel tilt and angle. Field charging times typically increase by 10–20% due to suboptimal panel positioning and transitional sun angles at collection window edges. Seasonal variation in collection window hours requires route adjustment; summer traverse can sustain longer daily distances with shorter stationary charging periods, while winter traverse requires longer stationary periods or shorter daily distances.

Power generation compromise (panel damage, extended overcast, dense canopy) requires procedural response to maintain operational continuity. System redundancy is achieved through load reduction priority and core function preservation.

Panel damage recovery: Single-panel damage or failure (crack, reduced output) on a multi-panel system reduces collection capacity proportionally but does not prevent traverse. A system with four 1.0 m² panels operating at 3,200 W combined output, with one panel damaged (output reduced to 20%), loses approximately 20% collection capacity. Traverse continues at reduced charging rate; stationary charging periods are extended proportionally. If panel damage is repairable (panel cleaning, minor seal failure), perform repair immediately; if damage is structural (cracked glass, broken connection), continue traverse and plan major repair during planned stationary period of 3+ days.

Extended overcast conditions (multi-day cloud cover) reduce solar collection to 40–60% of clear-sky output. If overcast conditions persist and battery charge approaches 50%, activate load shedding protocol: reduce sensor update frequency (LIDAR to 2 Hz instead of 10 Hz), disable non-critical lighting, reduce navigation compute to essential path-finding only. This reduces total consumption by approximately 40% and extends battery life by equivalent amount.

Canopy cover management: When entering dense canopy (forest, urban canyon, narrow passage), solar collection drops below consumption rate immediately. Do not enter high-canopy terrain unless battery charge is at 80% or higher. Calculate estimated traverse time through canopy zone; if traverse time exceeds estimated battery duration at current load, reduce consumption preemptively by shedding non-critical loads before entering canopy.

Priority load shedding sequence (executed in order when battery capacity drops below indicated threshold):

  • 80% battery: No action required. Normal traverse.
  • 50% battery: Reduce lighting systems to essential navigation only. Reduce LIDAR update frequency to 2 Hz. Disable non-essential data logging.
  • 30% battery: Shut down acoustic detection system. Reduce navigation compute to essential waypoint following only (no predictive route planning). Reduce thermal management to minimum.
  • 20% battery: Shut down communication subsystem except emergency beacon. Reduce radar to 1 Hz update. Enter "traverse survival" mode: locomotion at minimum speed to preserve momentum and reduce load.
  • 10% battery: Shut down all non-essential systems. Maintain only: LIDAR (1 Hz), basic navigation compute, thermal management (minimum), emergency beacon. Prepare to halt and enter stationary mode.
  • 5% battery: Halt immediately. All systems except navigation computer and emergency beacon powered down. Wait for solar collection and stationary charging.

Minimum operational configuration: Core systems that cannot be disabled are navigation compute (essential for route continuity), LIDAR obstacle detection (safety-critical), and emergency communication beacon (system status transmission). These three systems consume approximately 55 W combined and can operate for 36+ hours on 2,000 Wh reserve capacity, allowing survival operation during extended power-generation failure.

Recovery procedure after power constraint: After battery charge is recovered to 80% through stationary charging, sequentially restore systems in reverse order: restore thermal management and reduce-frequency sensors, restore communication subsystem, restore standard sensor update rates, restore full navigation compute. Total restoration to full-system operation requires approximately 2 hours of charging time beyond reaching 80% capacity.

Load shedding priority sequence derived from operational risk assessment; systems affecting immediate safety (obstacle detection, basic navigation) are never disabled except at critical battery levels. Extended power-generation failure events (multi-day overcast, impassable canopy terrain, panel failure) require stationary charging periods of 3+ days or route planning changes that reduce canopy-covered segments.

Power data compiled from operational logs across all documented routes. Solar collection values measured at seasonal intervals across northern, central, and southern corridor routes. Discharge curves verified under controlled load conditions using representative system configurations. Temperature compensation factors derived from field testing in winter and summer operational periods. Charging strategy and load-shedding procedures refined through extended traverse missions requiring power constraint management and stationary charging cycles.